Interesting Piece on Marx and the Crisis

From Stumbling and Mumbling.  Hat tip to Economist's View.

I don't agree with all of this, but it's thought-provoking:


Marx: less relevant




The credit crunch is making Marx fashionable again. Which I find odd. Strictly speaking, this crisis has made Marx less relevant, not more.


Our current crisis is a less Marxist one than almost any post-war recession.


To Marx, crises originated in the real economy. Recessions occur when an over-accumulation of real capital equipment combine with a lack of demand to cause a falling rate of profit and then capital-scrapping, job cuts and slump.


Now, this was a great explanation for previous recessions. The long boom of the 1950s and 60s led to over-accumulation and falling profits and the recessions of the 70s and 80s. The tech bubble of the late 90s caused a massive over-accumulation of capital and nugatory profits. It's this stress upon profits that elevates Marx and his follower such as Kalecki above mere Keynesians.


However, this is a poor description of our current woes. Non-financial profits have been reasonably healthy. Instead, this crisis originates in the financial system.

Read the rest of the article

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Dollars & Sense.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.