For most of the 20th century, there was a clear wall between working people’s pension funds and the riskier corners of financial markets. This wasn’t accidental—it was the law.
Many feminists urge a transition toward a dual-earner/dual-carer system in which women and men alike earn money and provide unpaid care for their families and communities. But is this possible in the current economic system?
Fast-food workers’ protests around the country point up the gap between image and reality. From Slate; hat-tip TM. The idea is that post WWII, unions themselves helped create the image of workers as (white) male breadwinners in manufacturing jobs; now unions trying to organize fast-food workers have to overcome that mythology. The 1982 ad confounds this somewhat. Plus, the low-wage workers organizing across the country are doing a pretty good job of it--I think the media coverage has been great. Our annual labor issue (still in production) has a cover story focusing on that organizing, by sociologist Nicole Aschoff.
Last but not least: Richard Wolff in The Guardian: Organized Labor's Decline in the U.S. is Well Known, but What Drove It? He touches on key themes we address in our upcoming labor issue, including an interview with Barry Bluestone on Detroit's bankruptcy, and an article by Nancy Folbre on the economics of worker co-ops.