War Dollars, Care Dollars (and No Sense)
It seems like a good time to compare the running tally of war dollars with the cost of relentless attacks on public care provision in the United States.
Left Hook Economics contributors focus on critical analysis of the Trump administration’s economic policies, explaining threats to our economic future, and advancing alternative policy approaches in terms that are accessible to all.
It seems like a good time to compare the running tally of war dollars with the cost of relentless attacks on public care provision in the United States.
Instead of using the Supreme Court’s decision as an opportunity to liberate himself from his biggest policy blunder, Trump has doubled down on tariffs.
Not only is failure not an option, those fighting to avert cataclysmic climate change have achieved important successes worthy of celebrating.
Inequality is getting so bad even conservatives have started to acknowledge it. But that doesn't mean they'll do anything serious to make it better.
Political choices, not economic forces alone, have shaped the future prospects of the Social Security system.
The fundamental needs of U.S. capitalism have played a major role in motivating the U.S. government’s imperial actions.
Cuts in government spending and deportation threats against the workforce have sent costs soaring in daycare, eldercare, and long-term medical care.
Progressives all over the world are demanding that there be “no war for oil.” We must also call for the dismantlement of the world’s fossil fuel-dominant global energy infrastructure.
One should not jump from the condemnation of Trump’s tariffs by economists (and others) to an acceptance of free trade as a key to economic progress.
If Congress fails to renew the ACA enhanced benefits, millions will be unable to access the health care they need.
While many mothers enjoy adequate support from fathers, the risk of financial hardship looms large if the partnership comes to an end.
The costs of housing, food, childcare, and transportation are one side of the affordability issue, the side where Mamdani might be able to have a direct impact.